Chapter 23
and not permanent, pleasant and substantial as he had primarily maintained by word of his
mouth and in the presence of the same audience which comprised Licchavi princes. (The
venom, that is, the false view of
attÈ
, which had appeared out of the mouth of Saccaka, had
been made to be sucked out by the same mouth of Saccaka and an admission to be uttered
that it is
anatta
, not self, in the presence of the audience.)
In this manner the Buddha had Saccaka to definitely admit that the five
khandhas
are
impermanent, painful and insubstantial in the presence of throngs of people, and being
desirous of subduing him to accept the Truth with his head hanging down, the Buddha went
on to ask:
‚Heretic Saccaka, how would you like the question that I am about to ask? When a
person clings to
dukkha
, adheres to
dukkha
, cleaves to
dukkha
and considers
dukkha
(the five-fold aggregates) as this
dukkha
is mine (through clinging); this
dukkha
is I (through conceit) and this
dukkha
is my
attÈ
(self) (through wrong
view), could he himself accurately understand
dukkha
(with three
prinnas
)? Could
he remain abiding in complete extinction of
dukkha
?‛
Saccaka answered: ‚O Honourable Gotama.... How could it be possible! It is an
impossibility!‛ Whereupon, the Buddha went on to ask:
‚Wanderer Saccaka .... how would you think of the question I am about to ask? If
that is so, being clung to those
dukkha
(of five aggregates), attached to those
dukkha
(of five aggregates), cleaving to those
dukkha
(of five aggregates), do you
not hold the wrong view, and consider that this
dukkha
(of the five aggregates) is
mine (through clinging), this
dukkha
(five aggregates) is I (through conceit), this
dukkha
(five aggregates) is my
attÈ
or self (through wrong view). In view of all
this, you are on the wrong track in respect of view?‛
Saccaka answered: ‚O Honourable Gotama .... How could it not be so! I do consider it
so.‛
Then the Buddha gave further exhortation to Saccaka:
‚Saccaka, it is as if a man, desiring heart-wood, seeking heart-wood, and
wandering about, might enter the forest with a sharp hatchet. He might see a
plantain tree with a straight stem and devoid of a budding stalk. He cut off the
bottom part and then cut off its crown. Then he might peel the bark of the stem.
Having peeled the bark of the stem, that man would not get even the sap wood, let
alone heart-wood.
In the same way, Saccaka, as I question and cross-question you for reasons in
regard to your view, you prove to be empty, futile and a great failure.
O Saccaka, you have been boasting among the citizens of Vesali, through empty
pride thus: ‘I have never come across such persons as Samana BrÈhmanas or Fully
Self-Enlightened Buddhas, one who could resist me without perspiring from their
arm-pits when I refute and rebuke them on grounds of views; and even senseless
logs or wooden blocks could not remain unshaken when I talk about things in
terms of views, leave alone the living beings.’ ‚
The Buddha then exposing His golden coloured body to the assembly and said: ‚Saccaka
.... there is no trace of perspiration on my body.‛
(N.B As a matter of course, a compounded body perspires at one time or the other;
hence, the Buddha said: ‚....there is no trace of perspiration on body at the
moment.‛
As regards ‘exposition of the golden coloured body’ it does not mean that the
whole body was exposed to view. It is customary among the Buddhas to have the
button-knob properly fixed to the button-ring of the robe when they take their seat
before an audience. The Buddha, on this occasion, held the robe above the upper
part of the throat and dropped just four inches of it to permit the emergence of red
rays, whirling round like a stream of liquid gold or flashes of lightning, right round