THE GREAT CHRONICLE OF BUDDHAS
1046
The words and phrases stated by him (attributed to the learned
bhikkhu
-elder) should be
carefully noted. They should be collated with the Suttanta and compared with the rules of
the Vinaya.
‚If, on collation with the Suttanta and comparison with the Vinaya rules, the words and
phrases, as stated by the
bhikkhus
, do not agree with the Suttanta or are not in line with the
Vinaya rules, then it must be concluded that, ‘This certainly is not what the BhagavÈ said. It
is something wrongly learnt by the
bhikkhu
.’ And concluding thus,
bhikkhus
, these words
should be rejected and ignored.
‚If, on the other hand, the words and phrases, as stated by the
bhikkhu
, on being collated
with the Suttanta and are in line with the Vinaya rules, then it must be concluded that, ‘This
certainly is what the BhagavÈ said. It is something correctly learned by the
bhikkhu
.’
Bhikkhus
, remember well this fourth directive principle regarding assertions attributed to a
great authority.‛
‚
Bhikkhus
, remember well these four directive principles regarding assertions attributed to
the Great Authorities.‛
Miscellaneous Points on The Subject
On this subject of the Four Great Authorities, the Commentary draws the attention of the
reader to miscellaneous points touching on it. A brief note follows:
Herein,
i) there are the four directive principles concerning the four great authorities; (in
DÊgha
NikÈya
)
ii) four directive Principles on the subject as taught in
Vinaya MahÈvagga
;
iii) four types of answers corresponding to four types of questions called the four
VyakaraÓas
;
iv) the four
Vinayas
;
v) the three Great Councils.
(i) The Four Great Authorities as taught in the Suttanta PiÔka
There are what has been described above.
(ii) The Four Great Authorities as taught in the Vinaya PiÔaka
(Matavagga; 6 Bhesajjakkhandhaka)
Four directive principles are laid down by the Buddha regarding what sort of medicinal
preparation is proper for
bhikkhus
:
(a) Bhikkhus
, a certain item of drug is not specifically mentioned by Me as improper for
use by
bhikkhus
, yet if it tends towards impropriety and rules out any possibility of its
propriety, in the light of Vinaya rules, then consider it as being improper for use.
(b) Bhikkhus
, a certain item of drug is not specifically mentioned by Me as improper for
use by
bhikkhus
, and if, in the light of Vinaya rules, it tends towards propriety and
rules out any possibility of its impropriety, then consider it as being proper for use.
(c) Bhikkhus
, a certain item of drug is not specifically mentioned by Me as proper for use
by
bhikkhus
, and if it tends towards impropriety and rules out any possibility of
propriety in the light of Vinaya rules, then consider it as being improper of use.
(d) Bhikkhus
, a certain item of drug is not specifically mentioned by Me as proper for use
by
bhikkhus
, and if it tends towards impropriety and rules out any possibility of
propriety in the light of Vinaya rules, then consider it as being improper of use by
bhikkhus
, and if it tends towards propriety and rules out any possibility of its
impropriety in the light of Vinaya rules, then consider it as being proper for use.
(iii) Four Types of Answer
There are four types of answers to match the four types of questions: