THE GREAT CHRONICLE OF BUDDHAS
968
your feet.‛
‚O Sakka of the Kosiya clan, I have left my feet unwashed for thirty full years. Human
body smells by nature. The smell is so pungent that even for a deva staying a hundred
yojanas
away from a human body, its smell is as obnoxious as carrion tied around his neck.
So leave the washing to me.‛
Sakka replied: ‚Venerable Sir, as for us the natural smell of the human body is obscured
by the fragrance of your morality, which rises beyond the Sense Sphere Deva realms
(
KamÈvÈcara
) and reach the topmost realm of the BrahmÈs. Venerable Sir, there is no
fragrance that surpasses the fragrance of morality. Your morality has compelled us to
render personal service to you.‛ Then Sakka took firm hold of the
bhikkhu-
elder’s ankle
with his left hand and washed his soles with his right hand till they glowed like the soft
soles of a child. After doing this personal service to the
bhikkhu-
elder, Sakka made
obeisance to him and returned to his celestial abode.
This is the story of the Bhikkhu-elder MahÈsÊva
In this way, a yogi, who finds himself unable to attain arahatship, feels (as in the case of
MahÈsÊva): ‚Ah, how I miss the opportunity of holding congregation with fellow-
bhikkhus
who are
arahats
‛. He becomes despondent suffering
domÈnassa-vedanÈ
. When he attains
jhÈnas
or Insight-Knowledge or
magga
or
phala
as the outcome of, or caused by, that
unpleasant feeling which he considers either as associated with initial application of the
mind and sustained application of the mind, or not associated with initial application of the
mind and sustained application of the mind. Such attainment are called, figuratively, as
unpleasant sensation with initial application of the mind and sustained application of the
mind, or unpleasant sensation without initial application of the mind and sustained
application of the mind. It should be noted that the Buddha termed these attainments as
figures of speech, taken from the point of view of result or that of cause.
Thus, according to the yogi's view of the unpleasant sensation, either as associated with
initial application of the mind and sustained application of the mind, or as not associated
with initial application of the mind and sustained application of the mind, when in due
course the unpleasant sensation leads to
jhÈna
or Insight-Knowledge, or
magga-phala
,
these attainments are called, figuratively, as unpleasant sensation with initial application of
the mind and sustained application of the mind, or as unpleasant sensation without initial
application of the mind and sustained application of the mind.
In this context, where a
bhikkhu
contemplates the
jhÈna
, whether neighbourhood
absorption (
upacÈra-jhÈna
) or the first
jhÈna
, called unpleasant sensation with initial
application of the mind and sustained application of the mind (
savitakka savicÈra
), as
impermanent, woeful and unsubstantial, and considers: ‚Where does this unpleasant
sensation originate?‛ he comes to understand that it has its origin in the body as its base.
From this understanding, he progresses, stage by stage, to arahatship. (Ref: the process of
insight development on the practice for the understanding of Contact (
phassa
), etc.
discussed curlier on.)
If there is another
bhikkhu
who contemplates the second
jhÈna
, the third
jhÈna
, etc. which
are called the unpleasant sensation which is not associated with initial application of the
mind and sustained application of the mind (
avitakka avicÈra
), as impermanent, woeful and
unsubstantial, by stages he attains arahatship.
In the above two cases, both have unpleasant sensation as the object of Insight meditation
but the unpleasant sensation, which is not associated with initial application of the mind
and sustained application of the mind, is superior to the unpleasant sensation which is
associated with initial application of the mind and sustained application of the mind.
Regarding the Insight-Knowledge gained from the meditation also, the former is superior
to the latter. Regarding the fruition of the final Path-Knowledge (
Arahatta-phala
) also, the
former is superior. That is why the Buddha says that, of the two types of unpleasant
sensation, the one that is not associated with initial application of the mind and sustained
application of the mind is superior.
These are points to note concerning (b)
Domanassa-vedanÈ
.