27b: The 9th Rains Retreat (Schism) – 943
The Buddha Exhorts the Rival Factions
An unknown monastic approached the Buddha and reported with respect all that
had happened. Whereupon, the Buddha uttered: “The Saṅgha is divided, the
Saṅgha is divided,” twice in succession and went to the monastics who had
suspended the monastic versed in the discourses and addressed them from a
prepared seat.
Monastics had, by then, not actually been divided, but the Buddha had said
it in anticipation of the imminent danger of a division in due course of
time. For instance, one might have said: “The rice grains have ripened,”
when one noticed the break of rains ushering in the season for harvesting,
although they were yet ripe; hence, the Buddha’s utterance.
The Buddha said: “Monastics, you should not, through pride and vanity, think of
suspending or expelling a monastic on account of a simple matter. Let us
suppose that a certain monastic might be guilty of an offence (
āpatti
) though he
did not think that it was an offence, on the one hand. On the other hand, there
might be monastics who held it to be an offence (
āpatti
). Monastics, if those
monastics know concerning that monastic: “This venerable one is well-informed
and well versed in the Discourses and the Discipline (
Dhamma-Vinaya
) and the
Monastic Rules (
Pātimokkha
), intelligent and wise, experienced, conscientious,
scrupulous and desirous of the three training practices; if we expel this monastic
for not seeing the offence, if we do not carry out the Observance together with
this monastic, and carry out the Observance without this monastic, by doing so,
there will be dispute, strife, fighting, there will be a schism in the order, there
will be an altercation in the order, dissension in the order, differences in the
order.” Monastics, knowing this, monastics should not suspend or expel a
monastic for not seeing an offence to ward off schism and promote unity.
Monastics, you should not, through pride and vanity, think of suspending or
expelling a monastic on account of a simple matter. Let us suppose that a certain
monastic might be guilty of an offence (
āpatti
) though he did not think that it
was an offence, on the one hand. On the other hand, there might be monastics
who held it to be an offence (
āpatti
). Monastics, if those monastics know
concerning that monastic: This venerable one is well informed and well versed
in the Discourses and the Discipline (
Dhamma-Vinaya
) and the Monastic Rules
(
Pātimokkha
), intelligent and wise, experienced, conscientious, scrupulous and
desirous of the three training practices; if we expel this monastic for not seeing