25a: The 7th Rains Retreat (Abhidhamma) – 849
brothers had to advise him to be generous, but with a sense of proportion. He
shifted to the city of Dakkhiṇapāṭha in the Damiṭṭha country to resume his
deeds of generosity along a stretch of land measuring twelve leagues, by the side
of the ocean. All along that stretch, he had rows of alms food resting on tripods
and almost touching one another. He lived to be 10,000 years old, giving
generously all the while and passed away. He was reborn in the celestial plane of
Tāvatiṁsa bearing the same name, Aṅkura.
Although Aṅkura had given much for such a long time, he did not get much in
return, this is because his recipients were destitute of virtue during a period the
worlds that were void of the Dispensation, just like a farmer who had sown his
seeds on barren ground.
This is a brief sketch of the life of Aṅkura. For full particulars, please
refer to the Stories about Petas (
Peta-vatthu
, Pv 2.9) and its commentary.
It was during the time of our Buddha Gotama and while Aṅkura Deva was
enjoying the life of a celestial Deva in Tāvatiṁsa, that a young man by the name
of Indaka offered, out of faith and devotion, a ladleful of rice to Ven.
Anuruddha who was on alms round.
After his demise, he was reborn as a powerful Deva in Tāvatiṁsa, endowed with
the ten privileges of celestial beings in reward for his meritorious deed done
during the Dispensation of Buddha Gotama, like a farmer who had sown his
seeds in a fertile field. He was known by the same name, Indaka.
The ten privileges of celestial beings are: 1) celestial objects of sight, 2) hearing,
3) odour, 4) taste, 5) touch; 6) longevity, 7) abundance of attendants, 8) good
appearance, 9) wealth or prosperity and 10) supremacy.
Aṅkura Deva had to make room for the more powerful Devas and Brahmas
attending the great Abhidhamma festival, so he was pushed back right up to 12
leagues from the Buddha, whereas Indaka Deva could retain his seat without
having to make room for any other celestial beings.
When the Buddha saw the difference in the status of Aṅkura Deva and that of
Indaka Deva, he thought it would be a good thing to bring out, for the sake of
the edification of beings, the differences in the benefits accrued from deeds of
merit done during the flourishing Dispensation of Fully Self-Awakened Buddhas
and that from deeds of merit done during a period void of the Dispensation. The
Buddha, therefore asked (Pv 322):
[611]