23b: The 5th Year (Saccaka) – 798
suffering, perception is suffering, volitions are suffering, sixfold
consciousness is suffering, Saccaka might have got a chance for
disputation. This is because, figuratively speaking, path and fruition are
regarded as suffering (
saṅkhāra-dukkha
). Hence, the omission of the fact
of suffering.
Otherwise, Saccaka would have asked: “Assaji what is the object of your
receiving ordination?” Then Ven. Assaji’s reply would be: “For the sake of
the paths and fruitions.” In such a case, he would be exposed to censure:
“Assaji, your Dispensation (
Sāsana
), after all, does not lead to
emancipation, in reality, your so-called Dispensation simply is a place of
oppression and destruction; your so-called Dispensation is a kind of hell
plane of misery! Therefore, your minds are void of desire for joy. Indeed,
you all have been wandering round striving anxiously after suffering.” It
was for this reason that Ven. Assaji had purposely avoided the
employment of the figurative term (
pariyāya
), and adopted the abstract
term (
nippariyāya
) that could not have another meaning, hence the
exclusive presentation of impermanence (
anicca
) and unsubstantiality
(
anatta
).
Whereupon, Saccaka said: “Assaji what improper things do I hear? We have
heard what ascetic Gotama has been teaching. Perhaps we could meet with
honourable Gotama sometime when there might be some discussion. Perhaps we
could then rid him of this evil view.”
At that time the 500 Licchavī princes were assembled at the Assembly Hall to
transact some business. Saccaka thought to himself: “I was unable to decry the
views of ascetic Gotama in the past because of not knowing anything about it.
Now, I have learnt about it from his great disciple Assaji, and I know them fully
well, I had better go to his place and reproach him for his views.”
He went first to the Assembly Hall where his 500 Licchavī princes were holding
a meeting. He bid them to come out from the chamber, shouting: “Come forth,
honourable Licchavīs! Come forth, honourable Licchavīs! Today, there will be a
discussion between ascetic Gotama and myself about his view. It is going to be a
grand show! Assaji, one of the five monastics and a well-known disciple of
ascetic Gotama, has stood firmly on the view of impermanence and
unsubstantiality. If ascetic Gotama also stands firm on the same view of
impermanence and unsubstantiality: