793
23b: The 5
th
Year (Saccaka)
Victory over the Wandering Ascetic Saccaka
The Buddha conquered the wandering ascetic Saccaka while taking up residence
at Kūṭāgāra monastery in the Great Wood near Vesālī. An account of this
wandering ascetic, Saccaka, will be reproduced here from the Short Birth Story
about the King of Kāliṅga (
Cūḷa-kāliṅga-jātaka
, Ja 301) and the Short Discourse
about Saccaka (
Cūḷa-saccaka-sutta
, MN 35) and their commentaries.
A long time ago, 7,707 descendents of the Licchavī royal family of Vesālī took
turns to rule the country. All those royal descendents were very much inclined
to investigate into various ascetic views prevailing at that time. Once, a
wandering mendicant, who professed 500 views, arrived in Vesālī. These royal
descendents held him in high esteem and treated him well. A female mendicant,
who also professed 500 views, arrived in the country of Vesālī at about the same
time.
The descendents of the royal family arranged a debate between the two
mendicants. The debate ended in a draw as one could not defeat the other since
they were equally matched. A peculiar idea struck the Licchavīs: “Should the
two be united in marriage, we could expect of them an offspring of great talent.”
So they persuaded them to remain in their country without taking the trouble of
wandering about. They treated them with respect and arranged for their
maintenance. As years rolled by, the couple produced four daughters and one
son. The names of the daughters were Saccā, Lolā, Avadhārikā and Paṭicchādā,
and that of the son was Saccaka.
According to the commentary on the
Short Discourse about Saccaka
(
Cūḷa-saccaka-sutta
, MN 35) the names of the daughters were Saccā, Lolā,
Paṭācārā and Ācāravatī.
When they came of age, they were given instructions on views held by their
parents: 500 paternal and 500 maternal views, a total of 1,000.
Special parental advice was also given to the four daughters: “My dear
daughters, if you find anyone who can refute your views, you might offer
yourself as his wife if he is a layman; should he, however, happen to be a
monastic, you might lead a homeless life under him.”