20c: The Wealthy Man Anāthapiṇḍika – 676
Whenever the Buddha went on a journey accompanied by the Saṅgha, Ven.
Sāriputta, though he could selfishly claim the privilege of staying close to the
Buddha as the chief disciple at the right-hand, he would never do so and leave
other monks to look after themselves, but would follow at the tail end of the
procession, personally caring and seeing to the comfort of the aged and sick
monks.
Such being the case, on this occasion also, having followed at the very end of the
procession, he arrived late and all beds and places being taken up by the Group-
of-Six monks. Having nowhere to sleep, he had to spend the night at the foot of
a tree. The Buddha, coming to know of this incident, considered: “If, while I am
still living, monks behave without respect for and showing deference towards
one another, what would they do when I attain Parinibbāna?”
Being filled with great urgency for the Dhamma (
Dhamma-saṁvega
), he caused
an assembly of monks to be held in the morning and asked: “Monks, is it true
that monks of the Group-of-Six monks, having gone along ahead of others, took
possession of the good dwelling places for themselves, denying suitable resting
places for the elder monastics?”
On being told that it was true, the Buddha rebuked the Group-of-Six monks and,
after having given a reasoned Dhamma talk, asked the monastics: “Who,
monastics, is worthy of priority concerning place, water for washing, and food?”
Some monastics replied: “Monastics of the royal blood have prior claim to a
place, washing water and food;” some said: “Monastics of the Brahmin class
have the priority concerning a place, washing water and food;” others again said:
“It is monastics of the wealthy householder class who are worthy of being
offered first a place, washing water and food;” while others maintained: “One
well versed in the Discipline, or a Dhamma teacher (
Dhamma-kathikā
), one
possessed of the first absorption (
jhāna
) … the second absorption … the third
absorption … the fourth absorption … are worthy of the first offer of a place,
washing water and food.”
Finally, there were those who opined that: “One who is a Stream-Enterer
(
Sotāpanna
) … Once-Returner (
Sakadāgāmī
) … Non-returner (
Anāgāmī
) … an
Arahat with simple insight (
sukka-vipassanā
) … an Arahat without super
knowledge (
abhiññā
) … an Arahat with the three knowledges (
tevijja
) …
an