14: Conversion of the Kassapa Brothers – 532
The Fifteenth Miracle
Still on another occasion, the 500 recluses went down into the river Nerañjarā
during the winter nights called the eight-in-between (
antaraṭṭhaka
),
174
when
there was very heavy snowfall and when it was terribly cold. Some of the
recluses wrongly believing that: “By emerging from the water once, evil deeds
can be cleansed,” climbed up the bank after submerging their whole bodies and
emerging from water only once. Many were those who entertained such a belief.
They submerged themselves just because there could be no emergence without
submergence. Some of the recluses wrongly believing that: “By submerging once,
evil deeds can be cleansed,” plunged but once with their heads under water and
came up on the bank as soon as they rose from the water, but only a few
entertained such belief.
Some of the recluses wrongly believing that: “If a bath is taken by repeatedly
immersing and emerging evil deeds can be cleansed,” bathed in the river,
constantly immersing and emerging from it. There were many of them who held
such a belief.
Thereupon, the Buddha created 500 braziers. The recluses warmed themselves at
the 500 braziers when they came out of the water. Thereupon, the 500 recluses
thought: “The creation of these 500 braziers must certainly be due to the
supernormal power of the monk.”
And Uruvelā Kassapa thought thus: “This great monk can indeed create these
braziers which number 500. This monk is indeed mighty and powerful. But even
though he is so mighty and powerful, he is not yet an Arahat like me, whose
pollutants have been destroyed.”
The Sixteenth Miracle
One day, there was a great downpour of unseasonal rain in Uruvelā forest,
where the Buddha was residing; a torrential stream of water flowed incessantly.
The place where the Buddha was staying was low-lying and therefore liable to
174
Antaraṭṭhaka
: here it means the eight days which fall between the end of one month
and the beginning of the following month. At the end of this fifteenth miracle the
author had a long discussion, on which of two months should be considered in this
context, quoting numerous authorities including Sanskrit texts, Pāli commentaries and
sub-commentaries. We have left out this portion from our translation.