11: The Discourse about Nālaka – 492
fact, I, a noble ascetic, discerning through knowledge and wisdom what is
profitable and what is not, teach only the profitable Dhamma.
168
In
teaching the Dhamma, it is done only by knowing distinctly: “This
Dhamma is for the benefit and welfare of this person. That Dhamma is
for the benefit and welfare of that person.”
169
[388]
Yo ca jānaṁ saṁyatatto, jānaṁ na bahu bhāsati,
sa munī monam-arahati, sa munī monam-ajjhagā.
My dear son Nalaka, the ascetic practising the path of practice to moral
perfection, is deserving of the practice only if, understanding the
Dhamma analytically, discerned and taught by me as the means of
knowledge and wisdom capable of breaking up the defilements (
nibbedha-
bhāgiya-ñāṇa-paññā
) and taking care to keep it well guarded, he does not
talk too much speaking words which he knows cannot be of benefit to
beings. In fact, the ascetic practising the path of practice to moral
perfection can surely realise the path-knowledge of an Arahat (
Arahatta-
magga-ñāṇa
).
In this manner, the Buddha concluded the delivery of the noble Dhamma
teaching concerning the path of practice leading to moral perfection (
moneyya-
paṭipadā
) which has the Arahat fruition (
Arahatta-phala
) as its ultimate
achievement.
Upon hearing the Buddha’s discourses on the path to moral perfection (
moneyya-
paṭipadā
) which has the Arahat fruition as the ultimate achievement, Ven.
Nalaka became one who had but little desire to engage in three matters: 1)
Seeing the Buddha; 2) hearing the Dhamma; and 3) asking questions concerning
the path to moral perfection. To elaborate:
1. At the end of his hearing of the Dhamma teaching concerning the path to
moral perfection, Ven. Nālaka was very much pleased and delighted and, after
paying respects to the Buddha to his heart’s content, he entered the forest. After
entering the forest, such a wish as: “It will be good if I can once again see the
168
Even though the Dhamma is sometimes taught all day long, it is not done so just to
pass the time.
169
What is meant is: It is not that the Buddha utters unsubstantial words just because he
is by nature talkative.