The Second Treatise on the Perfections – 2873
9. To contemplate with equanimity even the most sublime bliss of the
absorptions (
jhāna
) is the function of equanimity resulting from the third
absorption (
jhānupekkhā
).
10. To contemplate with equanimity which is purified of all opposing factors is
the function of equanimity from the purity of the fourth absorption
(
pārisuddhupekkhā
).
Thus, not only the differences of functions but also those of the sense objects
should be noted. Equanimity of effort is a concomitant of effort (
viriya-
cetasika
), and equanimity regarding feelings (
vedanupekkhā
) is a concomitant
of feeling (
vedanā-cetasika
): These two equanimities are quite separate from
other concomitants (
cetasika
) in terms of Dhamma.
Equanimity regarding formations and equanimity of effort are both
concomitants of wisdom (
paññā-cetasika
). But they have two different functions
as follows: Contemplating without making special efforts on the three
characteristics of conditioned things (
saṅkhāra
) is equanimity resulting from
insight; equanimity, when contemplating without fear of conditioned things
(
saṅkhāra
) is equanimity regarding formations.
[1669]
Equanimity as a Perfection and the Ten Equanimities
The list of these ten equanimities mentioned by the commentators do not
directly include equanimity as a perfection. One might, therefore, be anxious to
know: Is the exclusion due to the fact that equanimity as a perfection is not
associated with any of the ten, or is it an oversight on the part of the
commentators? It could not be said that the commentators were so negligent as
to leave it out from their list. It is to be taken that the perfection of equanimity
is contained in the equanimity as a sublime living (
Brahma-vihārupekkhā
).
However, some are of the opinion that the equanimity as a sublime living and
the perfection of equanimity are two different things. According to them, taking
up one and the same attitude towards one’s foe and friend is the perfection of
equanimity; taking up one and the same attitude towards the happiness and
suffering of beings, with the thought that these two conditions are the result of
their own deeds, is equanimity as a sublime living.
That is to say, the perfection of equanimity contemplating the happiness and
suffering of beings is not the perfection of equanimity but equanimity as
sublime living.