The Second Treatise on the Perfections – 2863
All beings have productive deeds as their heritage (
sabbe sattā kamma-dāyādā
).
All beings have productive deeds as their origin (
sabbe sattā kamma-yonī
).
All beings have productive deeds as their kinsfolk (
sabbe sattā kamma-bandhū
).
All beings have productive deeds as their refuge (
sabbe sattā kamma-
paṭissaraṇā
).
A Point to Consider
In this connection, a point to consider is this: It is clear that loving-kindness is a
perfection to be fulfilled for the welfare of beings and thus deserves to be
considered as a noble perfection. On the other hand, though equanimity
is a
perfection to be fulfilled, it is a mental disposition which holds that “happiness
or suffering is one’s lot in life; if one is possessed of good deeds conducive to
happiness, one will be happy; if one is possessed of bad deeds conducive to
suffering, one will suffer. I can do nothing to alter the productive deeds of
others.” Is it not difficult to call such an attitude noble? Will it be wrong if one
says that equanimity
is an attitude of mind which does not care for the welfare
of beings and which remains apathetic towards them? It is therefore necessary to
consider why equanimity
is ranked as an exalted perfection.
In both secular and spiritual matters, it is natural that something which is
difficult to get is of great value, and something which is easy to get is of little
value. It is, therefore, a common knowledge that in the world, easily available
materials, such as pebbles and sand, are cheap, whereas gold, silver, rubies and
other gems, which are hard to come by, are precious.
Similarly in spiritual matters, greed, hate and other unwholesome mental states
are likely to arise easily; accordingly, they are of little worth. It requires no
special exertion to let them arise. As a matter of fact, what is difficult is to
prevent them from arising in an uncontrollable manner. They are indeed like
useless weeds. On the other hand, giving (
dāna
), morailty (
sīla
) and other
wholesome deeds cannot happen without putting forth the necessary effort; they
do not take place automatically. One such meritorious deed is the development
of genuine loving-kindness which is even superior to giving and morality. This
genuine loving-kindness is indeed difficult to be developed.
[1664]
There are three types of persons: a foe (
verī-puggala
), neither foe nor friend
(
majjhatta-puggala
) and a friend (
piya-puggala
). It is difficult to develop loving-
kindness directed towards a foe (
verī-puggala
), but not so difficult towards