Miscellaneous Topics – 2444
dependent disagreeable sensation (
geha-sita-domanassa-vedanā
). When one
does not get some desirable visible object, sound, odour, taste, tangible object, or
thought cognized through or by the eye, ear, nose, tongue, body and mind, one
feels miserable. When these six kinds of sense objects that one has enjoyed do
not last, they are painfully missed by the one who cherishes them. Thus
unpleasant sensation (
domanassa-vedanā
) arises in one on account of the six
sense objects. If these unpleasant sensations are allowed to arise repeatedly,
demeritoriousness increases, and meritoriousness decreases. That is why the
Buddha said that unpleasant sensation arising out of the six sense objects should
not be resorted to.
The unpleasant sensation which tend to decrease demeritoriousness and increase
meritoriousness, and should therefore be resorted to means disagreeable
sensations dependent on renunciation (
nekkhamma-sita-domanassa-vedanā
). To
the monastic who has renounced the worldly life and taken the practice of
insight-development through various methods of contemplation, then visible
objects, sounds, odours, tastes, tangible objects, and thoughts are perceived as
impermanent and subject to change. Further, there comes the realization that
[964]
in truth and reality, the six sense objects in the past as well as at present
are impermanent, subject to change, and are suffering. This realization is insight
knowledge. Once the true nature of the six sense objects is understood, the mind
of that monastic yearns for release from the six sense objects which arise in the
conditioned phenomena of mind and matter. Directing his mind to Nibbāna, he
has a longing (
pihā
), a mild form of greed (
lobha
) in the ultimate sense, to attain
the supermundane.
In this connection, the Pāḷi term longing (
pihā
) needs some explaining. The
expression: “The longing to attain the supermundane,” does not mean that
longing takes the Arahat fruition (
Arahatta-phala
) as its object, because
longing is a mild form of greed
which primarily is a demeritorious factor.
Not to speak of a demeritorious factor, even meritorious factors divested
of wisdom do not take Nibbāna as their object. Hence longing does not
take Nibbāna as its object.
The fact is that the yogi has hearsay knowledge of Nibbāna. The sublime
attributes of Nibbāna have not only been learnt about from other people,
they have become imbued in the yogi’s mind through book learning,
meditation and insight development, and a yearning towards Nibbāna has
thus already been formed. This knowledge, of course, still remains in the