The Life Stories of the Nuns – 2130
Thereupon, a nun who was adept at the Vinaya gave Dhammadinnā instructions
to reflect on the loathsomeness of the body, beginning with reflecting on the
group of five constituent parts: head hair, body hair, nails, teeth, and skin. Then
she shaved Dhammadinnā’s hair, and donned her with robes. Visākha then made
obeisance to Ven. Dhammadinnā and said: “Venerable, be happy in the monastic
life in the teaching of the Buddha. The Buddha has taught us the doctrine which
is superb in the beginning, in the middle, and in the end.” Then he went home.
From the day Ven. Dhammadinnā became a nun, she received much respect and
many gifts from the people. In seeing so many visitors, she had little time left to
meditate alone.
This much of the account of Dhammadinnā, is taken from the commentary
on the Short Discourse giving an Elaboration (
Cūḷa-vedalla-sutta
, MN 44).
Ven. Dhammadinnā considered thus: “Visākhā has made an end of suffering
(
dukkha
) even while remaining in the household life. I as a nun, must make an
end of suffering.” She went to her preceptor and said: “Venerable, I am tired of
living in this place which is full of the five kinds of sense pleasures. I would like
to go and live in a nunnery in a small village.” The preceptors knew well that
Ven. Dhammadinnā’s wish could not be ignored as she came of a high class
family, and so they took her to a nunnery at a small village.
Due to her meditative exercises in her many past existences in seeing through
the nature of conditioned phenomena Ven. Dhammadinnā did not take long to
gain insight and became an Arahat together with the four analytic knowledges.
Then knowing her own attainment, she considered which place would suit her to
help others attain Awakening. There was nothing much she could do in the small
village whereas in Rājagaha she could help her own kith and kin. So she decided
to return to Rājagaha and, requesting her preceptors to accompany her, she
returned to Rājagaha.
Visākhā’s Questions on the Doctrine
When Visākhā learnt that Ven. Dhammadinnā had returned to Rājagaha, he was
eager to
[1403]
know why, after having gone to live in a small village, she
returned so soon. He would go to her and find out but he did not wish to ask a
plain question whether she was quite at home with monastic life. Rather, he
would pose profound questions relating to the five aggregates that are the