34d: The 20th Rains Retreat (Sudinna) – 1171
evil practice when he had sexual intercourse with his ex-wife, or so the teachers
say.
[738]
A question may arise here: “Was such a hindrance possible to occur to one,
who is endowed with the potential for higher attainments, even in the
lifetime of a Buddha?” The answer is: “Yes, it was.” But the hindrance did
not derive from the Buddha. In fact, Buddhas are those who endeavour to
help others attain the paths and fruitions; they constantly put efforts for
the spiritual welfare of others. Therefore no hindrance can come from
them to those who are possessed of the merits of their past.
In reality, a hindrance on spiritual progress is due to inadequacy of
performance, and association with bad friends. Of these two, inadequacy
of performance is of two kinds: the lack of teaching effort which is
conductive to the paths and fruitions on the part of the teacher, and the
lack of practice conductive to the paths and fruitions on the part of the
student who is endowed with the merits of the past.
Of these, inadequacy of performance on the part of the teacher means that
on the part of a Buddha’s disciple only, and not on the part of Buddhas.
Explanation: in the Discourse to Dhanañjānī (
Dhanañjānī-sutta
, MN 97) it
says that while the Brahmin Dhānañjānī was dying, Ven. Sāriputta taught
him the doctrine of the four sublime practices (
Brahma-vihāra
) that could
lead him to the Brahma abode. When the Brahmin died, he was reborn in
that very plane of existence. Details should be taken from the discourse. If
Ven. Sāriputta, the General of the Dhamma, had known of the latent
qualifications of the Brahmin and if he had taught him accordingly, he
would have become a Stream-enterer (
Sotāpanna
). But now the teaching
was different and the Brahmin’s attainment was short of the noble status.
Inadequacy of performance on the part of the teacher thus can cause the
danger of failure to reach the paths and fruitions.
An example of inadequacy of performance on the part of the student who
has qualifications may be seen in the Discourse to Kandaraka (
Kandaraka-
sutta
, MN 51). According to this discourse, a wandering ascetic, named
Kandaraka and an elephant trainer’s son, named Pessa, once went to the
Buddha, who taught them the four individuals, the first being one who
worries himself (
attantapa
).
When the Buddha finished just an outline of the discourse, and before he
could go on to deal with it in detail, Pessa, the elephant trainer’s son,
departed in satisfaction. If he had listened to the discourse in detail, Pessa
would have become a Stream-enterer (
Sotāpanna
). As he left after hearing