31: The 12th Year (Rāhula) – 1045
can become an Arahat in one sitting; even if he cannot become an Arahat,
he can became an Arahat when nearing his death (
sama-sīsī
); if not,
during his rebirth in a celestial abode, he can become an Arahat after
listening to the Dhamma from a Deva; if not, he can become a
Paccekabuddha at a time when there is no Perfect Buddha; if not, he can
become an Arahat by quick super knowledge (
khippābhiññā
) like Ven.
Bāhiya Dāruciya in the lifetime of a later Buddha. In this way the
meditation of mindfulness on the in-breath and out-breath is of great
benefit.
Discerning the great benefit thus, Ven. Sāriputta urged and encouraged
Rāhula, who had taken him as preceptor and who was his co-resident pupil
(
saddhi-vihārika
), to practise the meditation of mindfulness on the in-
breath and out-breath.
In this way, the Buddha and Ven. Sāriputta gave Rāhula meditation on matter
and meditation of mindfulness on the in-breath and out-breath respectively and
went away. Rāhula remained at the monastery.
Although, knowing that Rāhula was left behind, the Buddha did not personally
bring food for him, nor did he send food through Ven. Ānanda nor did he
inform his male
[747]
and female supporters, such as King Pasenadi,
Anāthapiṇḍika the wealthy merchant, etc., of the matter. Had they known of
this, they would have pots of food conveyed by means of a carrying pole.
Like the Buddha, Ven. Sāriputta did nothing. For that very day Ven. Rāhula
received no food at all and had none whatsoever. Despite his being deprived of
provisions thus, he did not mind a bit, thinking: “Though the Fortunate One
knows that I have been left behind at the monastery, he does not bring, in person,
the food he obtained, nor does he send through somebody else, nor does he tell
lay people of the matter. Though my preceptor also knows that I have remained
behind at the monastery, he too does nothing for me.” How could there be a low
or high opinion, contempt or admiration, in him on account of that? There was
neither. In the morning as well as in the daytime, he engaged in meditation on
the element of matter as taught by the Buddha: “It is true that matter is
impermanent for such and such a reason, it is true that matter is suffering for
such and such a reason; it is true that matter is unpleasant for such and such a
reason; it is true that matter is insubstantial for such and such a reason.”
He reflected thus incessantly like a man who urgently kindles a fire, and in the
evening he pondered: “I have been instructed by my preceptor to develop the